Ask most marketing teams how much traffic ChatGPT sends them and you get a shrug. Not because nobody looked — because the number is not in the report they usually open.
AI-referred visits arrive with unreliable referrer information, so analytics tools quietly file a large share of them under direct traffic, mixed in with bookmarks and typed URLs. The channel exists; the label does not.
AI Traffic Attribution exists to put a name on those visits.
A visitor from an assistant does not behave like a search visitor. There is often no referring page, sometimes no referrer header at all, and the link may have been rewritten before the click. Default analytics has nowhere sensible to put that, so it goes to direct.
Open AI Traffic Attribution and the first thing it asks is how you want to track. There are two routes, and you pick one:
Neither is better in general. The right one depends on what you already have.
Most disappointment with this screen comes from step 3. A 7-day window on a new setup shows almost nothing — that is the window, not the channel.
Choosing Google Analytics takes you through an authorisation step and then a Choose a Google Analytics property picker listing your GA4 properties.
A few states you may meet, and what each means:
The alternative is Your tracking snippet — a short script with a Copy snippet button. Paste it into your site's head, once, on every page.
This route is the better choice more often than people expect:
Once it is live the screen shows Using tracking snippet as the source, and behaves identically from that point on.
With data flowing, the screen gives you a time range of 7, 30 or 90 days and four views.
The headline count for the selected range, with its change against the previous period. On most sites this will be a small number, and the change matters far more than the level.
A table of platform, visits and share. This is the most informative view on the page — not because of the totals, but because of which platforms appear at all. A platform sending zero visitors while your visibility score there is decent is a mismatch worth investigating.
The trend line. Direction is the signal here; weekly totals on a thin channel bounce around for reasons that have nothing to do with you.
The same volume cut by source rather than platform, which is what you need when one assistant reaches you through more than one surface.
Top Pages by AI Traffic is the section to spend real time in. These are the pages assistants are actually sending people to — which means these are the pages they trust.
Read the list as a template rather than a scoreboard. Whatever those pages do — answering directly, listing specifics, structuring clearly — is the shape that works for your site on these platforms. Apply it to the pages that earn nothing.
The list is also a reality check on your assumptions.
The page you consider your best commercial asset is frequently absent, and an old, plain, unglamorous explainer is at the top. That is not an accident: assistants prefer the page that answers the question over the page that sells.
ApexaRank.ai separates AI-referred visits from direct traffic, breaks them down by platform and page, and shows the trend over 7, 30 or 90 days.
CHECK YOUR AI VISIBILITYExpectations are where this screen most often goes wrong, so it is worth being blunt about the numbers.
A visitor who arrives from an AI answer has already been told you are a reasonable choice. They arrive later in the decision than almost any other channel.
Three comparisons make this screen actionable, and all three need the visibility report open beside it:
You are being named and nobody clicks. Usually the mention is descriptive rather than a recommendation — check the sentiment phrases for that platform, and whether your page gives a reason to visit.
Something is working that your tracked prompts do not cover. Look at the top pages and work backwards to the questions they answer — those questions belong in Prompt Research.
Concentration risk. A single assistant changing how it cites can remove the whole channel overnight. Use your visibility report to find the platform you are weakest on and work there next.
Google Analytics if GA4 is already running; the snippet if it is not. Do not wait for the perfect setup.
AI traffic is thin. A 7-day window on a new setup will look like nothing is happening.
Which platforms send anyone at all matters more than the raw count.
The pages AI sends people to are the pages it trusts. That is a content template.
Cited but no traffic, or traffic with no citations — both are findings worth chasing.
Measure this channel by what visitors do, never by how many of them arrive.
It is small and will stay smaller than search for a while. Volume is the least interesting thing about it.
Thin data plus a short window equals an empty chart. Start at 90 days and narrow later.
Every figure on the page inherits that choice. It is the first thing to re-check when the numbers look implausible.
It is the clearest statement in the product of what AI platforms consider a good page on your site.
See where you stand, uncover visibility gaps, and discover what to improve next.
Get your first visibility score in minutes.